Evidence Hub

Comparison of intravenous and oral definitive antibiotic regimens in hospitalised patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia from a urinary tract infection

Thurber KM, Arnold JR, Narayanan PP, Dierkhising RA, Sampathkumar P

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2019

346 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Transitioning patients from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotic therapy has been shown to be a successful approach for several infections. However, minimal data exist evaluating outcomes following transition from to oral antibiotics for patients with bacteraemia secondary to a urinary tract infection (UTI). This study compared treatment failures between patients treated exclusively with IV antibiotics and those transitioned from IV to oral antibiotics for bacteraemia secondary to UTI.

METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective cohort study included hospitalised, non-critically ill adult patients treated with culture-susceptible antibiotic therapy for 7-21 days. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the route of definitive antibiotic administration. Treatment failure was a composite outcome of death and recurrence of the index micro-organism within 21 days following negative blood cultures.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among the 346 patients enrolled, 82 (23.7%) were in the IV cohort and 264 (76.3%) were in the IV-to-oral cohort. A total of six treatment failures occurred; 2 (2.4%) in the IV cohort and 4 (1.5%) in the oral transition cohort (hazard ratio=0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.11-3.39; P=0.58). All failures were due to recurrence of the index organism. Secondary outcomes demonstrated a significantly higher rate of IV line-associated complications in the IV cohort (P=0.03) and a favourable hospital length of stay in the oral cohort (P<0.001). Patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 346 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free