Evidence Hub

Incidence, risk factors and microbiological aetiology of urinary tract infections in admitted stroke patients at a teaching hospital in Zimbabwe: A prospective cohort study

Nickson Mukapa, A. Mataruse, G. Ngwende, V. Robertson

Infection Prevention in Practice, 2022

145 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Summary Background and purpose The occurrence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) after stroke is a well recognised complication. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of UTIs in stroke patients admitted at a teaching hospital in Zimbabwe. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in stroke patients admitted within 7 days from onset of stroke. Patients were followed up throughout the admission period and those with symptomatic UTI were identified. Urine samples for analysis were collected and causative bacterial organisms were identified with their antibiotic susceptibility patterns analysed. Results A total of 145 stroke patients were followed up during their in-patient care. 28 patients (19.3%) developed a urinary tract infection, 45 patients (31%) had asymptomatic bacteriuria and 72 patients (49.7%) had no bacteriuria. The median time from admission to UTI occurrence post stroke was 5 (IQR 4–7) days. Severe stroke (NIHSS score 16–42) was an independent risk factor for UTI development with an odds ratio (OR) 5.15 (1.68–15.75) p<0.001.The commonest bacterial causative organisms cultured were Escherichia coli (27.6%) ; Klebsiella species (21.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis (19.7%). Twenty nine percent of the cultured Gram negative bacteria were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers. Conclusions UTIs are common in admitted stroke patients and a significant percentage of causative organisms are multi-drug resistant. UTI occurrence is more common…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 145 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free