Evidence Hub

Proteus vulgaris Response to Various Antibacterial Agents

Arwa Saud Abbas, Hafiz Shahzad Muzammil, Hina Asif

Futuristic Biotechnology, 2021

Abstract

Proteus vulgaris is commonly associated with urinary tract infections, wound infections and sepsis. The ability of microorganisms to resist antibiotic actions is referred to as antibiotic resistance. Objective: To compare the antibacterial effects of various medications on clinical isolates of P. vulgaris was the goal. Methods: Over the course of a year, 1000 samples were collected in a cross-sectional study at a hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique was used to test for antibiotic susceptibility. Results: It was determined that the most efficient antibacterial medicines against P. vulgaris. were Imipenem, Gentamycin, Amikacin, Augmentin, Linezolid, Levofloxacin, Ceftazidime, Norfloxacine, and Cefazolin. On the other hand, Meropenem, Cephalothin, Rifampicin, Cefoxitin, and Ampicillin had little effect on Proteus vulgaris. Conclusions: The study emphasizes the significance of preventative measures, such as responsible antibiotic use, the development of novel treatments, and the application of infection control techniques in healthcare settings, to effectively manage and prevent the spread of resistance. Antibiotic resistance in P. vulgaris is becoming a growing cause for concern.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free