Evidence Hub

Risk of Dementia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kumari K, Bai A, Geeta F, Wadhwani N, Kumar R, Kumar A, Kumari R, Bai L et al.

Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2026

2,433,086 participants

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a known risk factor for dementia, yet the cognitive impact of different glucose-lowering therapies remains unclear. Emerging evidence suggests sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may confer neuroprotective benefits compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.

Objective: To compare the risk of incident dementia among patients with T2DM initiating SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted through June 1, 2025. The primary outcome was all-cause dementia. Secondary outcomes included Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Random-effects models were used to pool adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), and subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity by age, sex, and specific SGLT2 agents.

Results: Nine retrospective cohort studies encompassing 2,433,086 individuals (601,692 SGLT2i users; 1,831,394 DPP-4i users) met inclusion criteria. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause dementia (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.62-0.87), Alzheimer's disease (HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.52-0.74), and vascular dementia (HR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.49-0.60) compared to DPP-4 inhibitors. Subgroup findings were largely consistent across age and sex. Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin showed significant benefit, while canagliflozin did not.

Conclusion: Use of SGLT2 inhibitors is significantly associated with lower…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,433,086 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free