Evidence Hub

Patient Engagement to Counter Catheter-associated urinary tract infections with an App (PECCA): a multicentre, prospective, interrupted time series and before-and-after study

R. Bentvelsen, B. Laan, T. Bonten, R. van der Vaart, D. Hetem, R. Soetekouw, S. Geerlings, N. H. Chavannes et al.

Journal of Hospital Infection, 2023

6,556 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of urinary tract infections is increased by unnecessary placement and prolonged use of urinary catheters. We aimed to assess whether inappropriate use of catheters and catheter-associated UTI were reduced through patient participation.

METHODS

In this multicentre, interrupted time series and before-and-after study, we implemented a patient-centred app which provides catheter advice for patients, together with clinical lessons, feedback via emails and support rounds for staff members. Data on catheter use and infections were collected during a 6-month baseline and a 6-month intervention period on 13 wards in 4 hospitals in the Netherlands. Dutch Trial Register: NL7178.

FINDINGS

Between 25 June 2018 and 1 August 2019, 6,556 patients were included in 24 point-prevalence surveys, 3,285(50%) at baseline and 3,271(50%) during the intervention. During the intervention 249 app users and a median of 7 new app users per week were registered (IQR 5.5-13.0). At baseline, inappropriate catheter use was registered for 175 (21.9%) of 798 catheters, compared to 55 (7.0%) of 786 during the intervention. Time series analysis showed a non-significant decrease of inappropriate use of 5.8% (95%CI -3.76 to 15.45, p=0.219), with an odds ratio of 0.27 (0.19 - 0.37, p<0.001). Catheter-associated UTI decreased by 3.0% (1.3 - 4.6, p=0.001), with OR 0.541(0.408-0.716, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although UTI significantly decreased after the implementation, we found that patient…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free