Evidence Hub

Disseminated Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense infection in a Good's syndrome patient negative for human immunodeficiency virus and anti-interferon-γ autoantibody: a case report

Imoto W, Yamada K, Hajika Y, Okamoto K, Myodo Y, Niki M, Kuwabara G, Yamairi K et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Good's syndrome (GS) is characterized by immunodeficiency, and can lead to severe infection, which is the most significant complication. Although Mycobacterium rarely causes infection in patients with GS, disseminated nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infection frequently occurs in GS patients that are also positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or anti-interferon (IFN)-γ autoantibodies. Here, we report a rare case of GS with NTM without HIV or IFN-γ autoantibodies.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old Japanese male with GS and myasthenia gravis (treated with prednisolone and tacrolimus) was diagnosed with disseminated NTM infection caused by Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense. He presented with fever and back pain. Blood, lumbar tissue, urine, stool, and sputum cultures tested positive for M. abscessus. Bacteremia, spondylitis, intestinal lumber abscess, and lung infection were confirmed by bacteriological examination and diagnostic imaging; urinary and intestinal tract infections were suspected by bacteriological examination but not confirmed by imaging. Despite multidrug combination therapy, including azithromycin, imipenem/cilastatin, levofloxacin, minocycline, linezolid, and sitafloxacin, the patient ultimately died of the infection. The patient tested negative for HIV and anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS: Since myasthenia gravis symptoms interfere with therapy, patients with GS and their physicians should carefully consider the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free