Evidence Hub

SGLT-2 Inhibitors After Acute Coronary Syndrome As Preventive Approach for Heart Failure-Related Complications: A Meta-Analysis

Paulino-Gonzalez D, Pardiño-Vega MA, Andrade-Arbaiza E, Xiloj-López SA, Juárez-Aldana KV, Cruz-Hernandez SE, Amezcua-Guerra LM, Navarro-Martinez DA et al.

American journal of therapeutics, 2026

15,114 participants

Abstract

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have proven to be highly effective in the treatment of heart failure (HF), but their role in preventing stroke, cardiac death, or worsening heart failure events in patient's postacute coronary syndrome remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates whether SGLT-2 inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes in this setting. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database was conducted for studies published up to December 2024, identifying 10 studies, 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 3 cohort studies, which compared the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors initiated after ACS versus placebo in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome with at least 1 additional risk factor for heart failure hospitalization or adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, the meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42024543392) included data from 15,114 patients (6826 receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors and 8288 receiving placebo). SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of first HF hospitalization (RR = 0.78, 95% CI, 0.66-0.92, P = 0.003) and stroke (RR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.35-0.90, P = 0.02), with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). A significant reduction in cardiac death was also observed (RR = 0.84, 95% CI, 0.74-0.96, P = 0.0009), though this was driven mainly by observational studies. No significant effect was found for all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses showed that empagliflozin significantly reduced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 15,114 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free