Evidence Hub

Infections by Alloscardovia omnicolens and Associated Clinical Conditions: A Systematic Review

Antônio Neres Norberg, Paulo Roberto Blanco Moreira Norberg, Fernanda Castro Manhães, Fabiana Pereira Costa Ramos, Ivy de Campos, Renato Mataveli Ferreira Filho, Maria de Lourdes Ferreira Medeiros de Matos, Alcemar Antônio Lopes de Matos et al.

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 2023

Abstract

Background and Aim: Alloscardovia omnicolens is a gram-positive, non-motile, non-sporulating bacillus that is occasionally identified as a member of the human microbiota. Despite its infrequent colonization of humans, it has been detected in various anatomical sites, including the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, vaginal mucosa, and oral cavity, and has the potential to cause opportunistic infections. This systematic literature review aims to analyze the pathogenic potential of A. omnicolens and the underlying clinical conditions associated with infection. Methods: A systematic review of scientific manuscripts was conducted using the PubMed, SciELO, and Google Scholar databases. The search terms employed included "Alloscardovia omnicolens," "infection" "culture," and "identification". Manuscripts published in English, Portuguese, Spanish, and French from 2007 to 2023 were considered for review. Results: Following the bibliographic selection process, a total of five articles discussing Alloscardovia omnicolens infections were included, along with an additional thirty-six articles for analytical support. Conclusion: Infections caused by Alloscardovia omnicolens are infrequent and are predominantly associated with underlying medical conditions. The detection of this bacterium in cultures of organic specimens from patients, particularly those with neoplastic diseases, warrants clinical attention when patients are in critical health states or exhibit risk factors for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free