Evidence Hub

Real-World Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors Across Heart Failure Phenotypes: A Meta-Analysis

A E ME, Ahmed AA

Journal of diabetes research, 2026

8 participants

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated significant benefits in heart failure (HF) patients in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, real-world evidence (RWE) is crucial to confirm their efficacy in broader, unselected patient populations. This meta-analysis is aimed at synthesising real-world data on SGLT2 inhibitors in HF across various ejection fraction phenotypes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world observational studies on SGLT2 inhibitor use in HF patients. Comprehensive searches were performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Data were pooled using random-effects models, assessing heterogeneity and bias and performing subgroup analyses. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was PROSPERO-registered (CRD420261356715).

Results: Our search yielded over 4000 unique articles, with 21 observational studies (encompassing nearly 4.8 million HF patients from 17 countries) included in the quantitative meta-analysis. SGLT2 inhibitors consistently reduced HF hospitalisation rates in real-world use (pooled HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59-0.72). This included a significant reduction in those with cardiovascular disease (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.89) and without cardiovascular disease (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.71). The absolute risk reduction for hospitalisation for HF in people with a history of CVD (ARR 1.17, 95% CI 0.78-1.55) was significantly greater than for those without CVD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free