Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy using SGLT2 and DPP4 inhibitors to treat type 2 diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on an Asian subpopulation

Kim MJ, Cho YK, Kim S, Moon JY, Jung CH, Lee WJ

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025

7,588 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Aims: This updated meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of combining sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) in treating type 2 diabetes (T2D), especially in Asian subpopulations.

Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through January 2024 that compared SGLT2i/DPP4i combination therapy with DPP4i or SGLT2i monotherapy. The primary outcome was haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) changes. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the baseline HbA1c level (using 8.0%-8.5% as the cut-off) and racial groups (Asian vs. non-Asian).

Results: This analysis included 17 RCTs with 7588 participants. Compared to DPP4i, the SGLT2i/DPP4i combination significantly reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.57%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.67 to -0.46%), while promoting modest weight loss (MD -1.57 kg, 95% CI -1.93 to -1.20 kg). When compared to SGLT2i, SGLT2i/DPP4i promoted further reductions in HbA1c (MD -0.46%, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.38%) with no significant effects on body weight. Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of adding DPP4i in reducing HbA1c was more pronounced in Asian participants (MD -0.55%, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.39) than in non-Asian participants (MD -0.38%, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.31). The combination therapy was associated with a similar risk of hypoglycaemia compared to both monotherapy groups, with no statistically significant differences observed.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,588 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free