Evidence Hub

Redefining treatment paradigms: Early use of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in acute heart failure - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Immanuel SS, Yonatan ER, Tandecxi G, Anthony CP, Chan JZ, Sunardi AE, Posangi I, Bandana V

Narra J, 2025

1,417 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have proven to significantly reduce mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Supported by the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines and the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of rapid optimization of heart failure (STRONG-HF) trial, SGLT2i offer improved outcomes with a favorable safety profile, emphasizing their pivotal role in HFrEF management. The aim of this study was to evaluate early initiation with dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, focusing on their efficacy and safety in acute heart failure (AHF). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched seven databases for randomized controlled trials on SGLT2i in AHF (2019-2024). Outcomes included all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF)-related events, all-cause rehospitalization, length of hospital stay, diuretic response, serum electrolytes, and adverse events (AEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model and presented as standardized mean differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on intervention. Nine studies encompassing 1,417 patients with a generally low risk of bias were included. Initiating SGLT2i within five days of admission significantly reduced in-hospital all-cause mortality risk by 42% and in-hospital worsening HF…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,417 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free