Evidence Hub

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Diabetic Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Geum MJ, Oh KS, Ah YM

Journal of diabetes research, 2026

3 citations

Abstract

Background: Solid organ transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus face unique challenges in glycemic control, compounded by the metabolic effects of immunosuppressants. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in diabetes, evidence for their use in transplant recipients remains limited. We aimed to systematically review the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in transplant recipients with diabetes.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for studies published before July 2025. Seventeen comparative studies involving 12,892 transplant recipients with diabetes were included. Efficacy and safety data of SGLT2 inhibitors were extracted and analyzed. A random-effects model was used to pool the results.

Results: SGLT2 inhibitors led to a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (mean difference [MD]: -0.59% and 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.91 to -0.26) and body mass index (MD: -0.82 kg/m2 and 95% CI: -1.54 to -0.10) compared to controls. The risks of dialysis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.50 and 95% CI: 0.31-0.79), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR: 0.29 and 95% CI: 0.22-0.38), heart failure (OR: 0.66 and 95% CI: 0.52-0.83), urinary tract infection (OR: 0.45 and 95% CI: 0.22-0.92), graft rejection (OR: 0.73, 95% and CI: 0.64-0.83), and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.40 and 95% CI: 0.27-0.59) were significantly lower in the SGLT2 inhibitor group.

Conclusions:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free