Evidence Hub

The impact of new tetralogy drugs on ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Wang XW, Li H, Wang GQ, Sheng YN, Wang X, Pan H, Wang ZH, Zhang W et al.

BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025

16,425 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure, particularly heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), represents a major global health challenge due to its high prevalence, rapid progression, and substantial mortality rates. While the “New Tetralogy” drugs (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) have significantly advanced HFrEF management, their comparative effects on ventricular remodeling remain unclear. This network meta-analysis systematically evaluates these therapeutic agents to inform optimal clinical decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ventricular remodeling parameters in HFrEF patients. Twenty-two RCTs involving 16,425 participants were included. Data were analyzed using Stata 14.2 and RevMan 5.3, with outcomes expressed as mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Our study showed markedly different therapeutic characteristics: sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors significantly reduced left ventricular mass index (MD = -6.57, 95% CI: -11.98 to -1.16), while beta-blockers demonstrated superior improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction compared to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MD = 3.54, 95% CI: 0.60 to 6.48) through indirect comparison. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists showed greater…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 16,425 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free