Evidence Hub

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in urinary tract infections in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mitkie Tigabie, G. Ayalew, Lidetu Demoze, Kebebe Tadesse, Yalewayker Gashaw, Muluneh Assefa

BMC Urology, 2025

2,199 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections worldwide, particularly in developing countries. It also is among the most prevalent nosocomial infections, largely due to the widespread use of urinary catheters in hospitalized patients. These catheters often act as reservoirs for multidrug-resistant bacteria, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing pathogens, which significantly limit treatment options and delay appropriate care. This systematic review and meta-analysis, therefore, aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria associated with UTIs in Ethiopia. A systematic literature search of all available electronic databases such as PubMed, Hinari, Google Scholar and EMBASE, Scopus, and African journal online was performed. The quality of the included studies was assessed via the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. The data were extracted from the eligible studies via Microsoft Excel 2019 and analysed via STATA version 17. The presence of between-study heterogeneity was checked via the Cochrane Q statistic, and the magnitude was quantitatively measured via I2 statistics. To determine the possible sources of heterogeneity, a subgroup analysis was performed. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the influence of single studies on the pooled estimates. Publication bias was checked via funnel plots and Egger’s regression tests. A p…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,199 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free