Evidence Hub

The effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease; a systematic review and meta-analysis

M. Foroutan, Maliheh Yarmohammadi

Journal of Renal Injury Prevention, 2025

39,620 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is among the fastest causes of mortality worldwide, associated with cardiovascular disease and diabetes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of empagliflozin use on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and the Google Scholar search engine, were searched until June 5, 2023. Data were analyzed using STATA software version 14. A P< 0.05 indicated the significance of statistical tests. Results: Eight clinical trial studies with a total sample of 39620 participants were evaluated in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin administration in CKD patients lowered the risk of cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalization by 28% (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.80), cardiovascular death by 25% (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.88), first heart failure hospitalization by 30% (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.77), total (first and recurrent) heart failure hospitalizations by 28% (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.81), and all-cause mortality by 20% (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.93). However, it demonstrated no significant effect on reducing the risk of composite kidney outcome (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.55, 1.02). In addition, long-term empagliflozin use (over 105 weeks) caused a drastic reduction in cardiovascular death risk in these patients. The lowering…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 39,620 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free