Evidence Hub

Hidden dangers of pelvic fracture: A meta-analysis on urinary tract injury incidence and risk factors

G. Mariscal, A. Dway, C. Barrios

World Journal of Orthopaedics, 2025

22,700 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pelvic fractures are often associated with significant morbidity, including injuries to the urinary tract. Understanding the incidence and risk factors for urinary tract injury in these patients is crucial for prompt diagnosis and management. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize existing evidence to determine the overall incidence and identify specific risk factors associated with urinary tract injuries in patients with pelvic fractures. AIM To determine the incidence and risk factors for urinary tract injuries in patients with pelvic fractures. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted without date restrictions. Studies examining the incidence and risk factors of urinary tract injuries in patients with pelvic fractures were included. Data extracted included demographics, injury mechanism, pelvic fracture type, urinary tract injury incidence, mortality, and discharge disposition. Review Manager 5.4 was used for data analysis. RESULTS Ten studies comprising 22700 patients were included. The pooled incidence of urinary tract injury associated with pelvic fracture was 6.88% (95%CI: 6.20%-7.55%). Vehicle, motorcycle, and pedestrian accidents were identified as risk factors for urinary tract injury, with relative risks (RR) of 1.08 (95%CI: 1.06-1.11), 1.89 (95%CI: 1.78-2.00), and 1.53 (95%CI: 1.20-1.95), respectively. Pubic fracture and pelvic ring disruption were significantly associated with urinary tract injury…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 22,700 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free