Evidence Hub

Metagenomics in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

C. Jeff, S. Quarton, C. Hatton, D. Parekh, D. Thickett, A. McNally, E. Sapey

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2025

5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common causes of hospital admissions and contribute to anti-microbial resistance. Urine cultures have long laboratory turnaround times leading to empirical antibiotic prescribing and can miss polymicrobial infections. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) increases pathogen identification, but it is unclear whether this leads to improved patient care.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies focusing on hospitalised UTIs, which compared mNGS to standard cultures were included. Literature searches included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies -2 tool was used to assess study quality. Clinical outcomes included laboratory turnaround times and antibiotic prescriptions. A meta-analysis for pathogen positivity rates and subgroup analysis for pre-determined subgroups were completed.

RESULTS

Studies were small and often of low quality. Whilst mNGS pathogen positivity rate (PPR) was numerically higher across all studies, in the meta-analysis, this difference failed to reach statistical significance (OR = 2.72, 95 % CI [0.78-9.52], p = 0.147) and study heterogeneity was high (I2 = 83 %, p < 0.01). mNGS achieved higher polymicrobial identification in samples (410/839 (48.87 %) vs. 94/762 (12.34 %), and laboratory turnaround times appeared faster compared to standard culture.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free