Evidence Hub

Fetal Cystoscopy and Vesicoamniotic Shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Outcome and Current Technical Limitations

Irene Paraboschi, U. M. Pierucci, M. Peycelon, Gloria Pelizzo, R. Ruano

Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare obstetrical, survival, and nephro-urological outcomes of fetuses diagnosed with lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) undergoing antenatal procedures by vesicoamniotic shunting (VAS) or fetal cystoscopy (FC). Methods: This study was a literature search using MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane reference lists. All studies reporting VAS and FC’s effectiveness, complications, and technical issues in the prenatal treatment of LUTO were selected for a single-proportion meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. We computed and declared effect sizes for estimating a single proportion using the Freeman-Turkey transformed proportion. Results: Out of a total of 467 citations identified, 49 studies were included for a detailed evaluation of VAS and FC perinatal outcomes. Overall, VAS and FC were burdened by a similar incidence of intrauterine fetal demise (VAS: 0.51 [0.42–0.61] vs. FC: 0.47 [0.28–0.67]; p = 0.73), postnatal death (VAS: 0.87 [0.75–0.99] vs. FC: 0.86 [0.62–1.09]; p value: 0.87), and postnatal renal impairment (VAS: 1.22 [1.06–1.39] vs. FC: 0.96 [0.67–1.25]; p value: 0.12). Likewise, the two procedures were complicated by a similar rate of chorioamnionitis (VAS: 0.38 [0.28–0.47] vs. FC: 0.39 [0.12–0.66]; p value: 0.92), premature rupture of membranes/preterm premature rupture of membranes (VAS: 0.77 [0.60–0.94] vs. FC: 0.84 [0.60–1.07]; p value: 0.65),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free