Evidence Hub

Transperineal Laser Ablation for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Benign Prostate Enlargement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

I. Pires, M. O. da Silva Gobbo, Alexandre Yamada Fujimura, T. Milbradt, R. Sudo, Mable Pereira, N. Marquardt, G. Carvalhal et al.

International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 2025

777 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of transperineal prostate laser ablation (TPLA) in men with benign prostatic enlargement. Materials and Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to July 2024. Random-effects model was employed to compute mean differences for continuous endpoints. Heterogeneity was evaluated by prediction interval and I-squared statistics. Results were reported following the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Seventeen studies involving 777 patients with mean age of 62 to 80 years were included. Over 12-month follow-up, TPLA decreased the International Prostate Symptom Score (MD −12.62; 95% CI −14.87 to −10.37; p<0.001; I2 = 90%), post-void residual (MD −73.24 mL; 95% CI −96.91 to −49.57; p<0.001; I2 = 89%), and prostate volume (MD −21.23 mL; 95% CI −32.65 to −9.81; p<0.001; I2 = 84%). TPLA increased the maximum urinary flow rate (MD 6.32 mL/s; 95% CI 4.69 to 7.95; p<0.001; I2 = 81%). Ejaculatory and erectile functions were not impacted. Compared to TURP, TPLA was associated with ejaculatory function preservation, shorter operating time and length of stay. Risk of bias for the non-randomized studies was moderate, and low for the randomized studies. Conclusions: TPLA demonstrated favorable outcomes for BPE without a negative impact on sexual function. This minimally invasive treatment was found to have advantages over TURP, such as, ejaculatory function preservation,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 777 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free