Evidence Hub

Clinical Outcomes of Empagliflozin in the Treatment of Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Muhammad Hammad Azam, Muhammad Abdul Wahab, M. Shahzad, Farrukh Iqbal, S. Danish, Shitba Naeem, Khalid Iqbal Bhatti

Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, 2025

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of empagliflozin in patients with acute heart failure by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methodology: The recent systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by following guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020. Four Electronic databases were used namely: PubMed, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane library to find research articles. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was applied to assess the risk bias of included RCT’s and the pooled analysis was conducted by using RevMan (Review Manager) software version 5.4.

Results: About 13 RCT’s with 72,871 heart failure (HF) patients were analyzed to compare the effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin with placebo. The pooled analysis favored the experimental group as drug has controlled over first HF hospitalization among heart failure patients (Odds Ratio= 0.67; 0.52 to 0.876 Cl: 95%, p=0.13), total HF hospitalization among heart failure patients as (Odds Ratio=0.55; 0.42 to 0.74 Cl: 95%, p<0.00001), and total adverse events (fatal or non-fatal outcomes) among heart failure patients as (Odds Ratio=0.59; 0.40 to 0.88 Cl: 95%, p<0.00001). However, the levels of LVEF and NT-proBNP were reduced as reported through mean difference of LVEF (Mean difference= 0.41; -0.81 to 1.64 Cl: 95%, p<0.00001) and NT- proBNP among empagliflozin and placebo groups (Mean difference= -1.55; -7.00…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free