Evidence Hub

Phimosis Treatment and Risk of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Infant Males: A Systematic Review

Tatjana Heisinger-Heidler, Rachel Shannon, T. Meyer, Sophia Kamanzi, I. Rosoklija, Dennis B. Liu, David I. Chu, Corinne H Miller et al.

Urology, 2025

27 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of phimosis treatment through circumcision or topical corticosteroids in preventing recurrent UTI (rUTI) in male infants.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase™, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science™ and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted through September 2024 per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. English-language articles with primary data on rUTI rates post-circumcision or topical corticosteroid treatment in infants were included. Articles were excluded if participants had not experienced a prior UTI. Two authors independently assessed abstracts and articles; a third resolved discrepancies. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were applied for quality and risk of bias.

RESULTS

Of 3,283 abstracts, 69 full-text articles were reviewed and four met inclusion criteria (two on circumcision, two on topical corticosteroids). 11/35 (31%) uncircumcised premature infants and 6/53 (11%) uncircumcised boys developed a rUTI compared to none post-circumcision. Among 27 uncircumcised infants who received topical corticosteroids, none developed rUTI, vs. 27/165 (16%) untreated infants. Another study found phimosis resolution in 35/39 (90%) infants using topical corticosteroids vs. 8/39 (21%) using Vaseline. Infants were re-categorized by prepuce retractability, with rUTI in 2/28 (7%) infants with a retractile vs. 8/27 (30%) with a non-retractile prepuce.

CONCLUSIONS

This…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free