Evidence Hub

Characterizing the role of the urobiome in the pathogenesis of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs): a systematic review

J. Sheiber, Alejandra M. Duque, Adishi Ranjan, A. Diokno, Hubert Swana

International Urology and Nephrology, 2026

Abstract

PURPOSE

Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are associated with substantial morbidity, repeated antibiotic exposure, and increasing antimicrobial resistance. Emerging evidence suggests that alterations in the urinary microbiome (urobiome) may contribute to rUTI pathogenesis. This systematic review evaluated the role of the urobiome in the development and recurrence of rUTIs.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature searches were conducted and managed using Covidence systematic review software (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia). Searches included Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL and covered studies published from 2014 through 2026. The final search was conducted on February 1, 2026. The search incorporated terms related to 'urobiome,' 'urinary microbiome,' 'urinary tract infection,' and 'recurrent urinary tract infection.' Searches were restricted to English-language studies and human participants. After deduplication, 213 unique records underwent title and abstract screening, and 62 articles were assessed in full text. 21 studies that directly evaluated recurrent or chronic UTI populations, or reported an rUTI-specific subgroup, were included in the qualitative synthesis. Data extraction included study design, patient population characteristics, definitions of rUTI, urine collection methods, microbiome assessment methodology (including 16S rRNA sequencing and enhanced quantitative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free