Evidence Hub

Features and Management of Incidental Prostatic Lymphoma Obtained in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Surgery: A Systematic Review

Jeremy Cheng, S. Alwis, Nathan Papa, J. Ischia, Damien M. Bolton, Dixon Woon

Société Internationale d'Urologie Journal, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Prostatic lymphoma is a rare malignant tumour that frequently causes urinary tract obstruction. It is uncommon for patients to present with systemic features or B-symptoms. As a result, it is often diagnosed incidentally during surgical lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) treatment. This systematic review aims to identify any common clinical features of prostatic lymphoma diagnosed incidentally during surgical LUTS treatment and summarise disease treatment and outcomes. Methods: The study protocol was registered with Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A search was performed across the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Full texts of eligible studies were analysed and data were extracted. The review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results: A total of 24 case reports compromising 25 cases were included. The median (IQR) age was 67 (61–73) years. All patients reported LUTS as their primary complaint, and the median duration of LUTS prior to diagnosis was 17 (4–44) months. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was normal in 10 cases and prostatomegaly present on imaging in 16 cases. A total of 10 different subtypes of lymphoma were reported. Extra-prostatic involvement was reported in eight patients. Chemotherapy, with or without adjuvant radiotherapy, was the mainstay of lymphoma treatment. The majority of articles reported positive outcomes,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free