Evidence Hub

Empirical antibiotic prophylaxis versus culture-directed enhanced prophylaxis for prevention of urinary tract infection after flexible ureteroscopy in children: A randomized controlled trial

H. Arafa, Diaaeldin Mostafa, Mohamed S. Salim, Ashraf Amin, A. Farouk

Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the effects of empirical antibiotic prophylaxis versus culture-directed enhanced prophylactic measures on the rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) after flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in children.

METHODS

A randomized controlled study was conducted at our tertiary center between July 1, 2024, and December 1, 2024, involving 140 patients with renal or ureteric stones. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either empirical antibiotic or culture-directed enhanced prophylaxis (preoperative urine culture followed by culture-directed antibiotic therapy when indicated). Stone burden was determined using non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract (NCCT). The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative symptomatic UTI within 30 days, defined as the presence of fever (38 °C) and suspected sepsis without organ failure requiring supportive therapy and enhanced monitoring in addition to the antibiotic therapy.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age 4-16 years, renal/ureteric stones 1-1.5 cm.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

congenital renal anomalies, single functioning kidney, active symptomatic UTI at time of randomization, neuropathic bladder, diabetes, coagulopathy, elevated creatinine, or cardiorespiratory comorbidity.

RESULTS

Patient and stone characteristics were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups according to hospitalization time, readmission rates, or intraoperative complications. The overall…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free