Evidence Hub

P-1209. Efficacy of β-lactam Enhancer Based Zidebactam-Cefepime Combination (WCK 5222) versus Meropenem in Adults with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) in a Global, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Trial

Pencho Genov, B. Mladenov, Donatas Slaitas, Mario Gonzalez, P. Mahajan, Haihui Huang, Denise D. Sharp, A. Jandourek et al.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2026

529 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background The combination of β-lactam enhancer zidebactam and cefepime (ZID-FEP) is in development for the treatment of diverse infections caused by a wide range of MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria including MBL-producers. In a registration-enabling Phase 3 study (ENHANCE), efficacy and safety of ZID-FEP was compared against meropenem in adults with cUTI or AP. Clinical cure, microbiological eradication and overall success rates at test-of-cure visit in mMITT population Methods This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled and non-inferiority trial was conducted at 44 global sites across U.S., EU, India, Mexico, and China, enrolling hospitalized adults (≥18 years old) with a clinical diagnosis of cUTI or AP ± concurrent bacteremia. Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to receive ZID-FEP 1+ 2 g (1 h infusion) or meropenem 1 g (0.5 h infusion) for 7 to 10 days with dosage adjustments based on renal function. The primary efficacy outcome (FDA & EMA endpoint) was the proportion of patients in the Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (mMITT) population who achieved overall success (clinical cure combined with microbiological eradication) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 17±2). The non-inferiority margin was -15.0% and a pre-specified test for superiority for the primary endpoint was performed in the expanded-mMITT (e-mMITT) population following confirmation of non-inferiority (NCT04979806). Results Of the 529 patients randomized and treated (352 in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 529 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free