Evidence Hub

Do Prophylactic Antibiotics Decrease the Rate of Urinary Tract Infections after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ahmed A. Hussein, A. Mahmood, Ali Ahmad, Holly A Houenstein, Grace Harrington, Mohammad Khan, Dawod Abdelhaq, Z. Jing et al.

Journal of Urology, 2025

37 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of prophylactic antibiotics after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in the prevention of 90-day urinary tract infections (UTIs).

METHODS

Patients who underwent RARC with urinary diversion were randomized to standard of care (SOC) versus receiving prophylactic antibiotics (Nitrofurantoin 100 mg daily or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160/800 mg daily) for 30 days after discharge. The primary endpoint was 90-day UTIs (defined as positive urine culture with >105 cfu/ml associated with clinical symptoms, such as fever, chills, or flank pain). Secondary endpoints included adverse events, 90-day infectious complications, UTI-related readmissions, and cost.

RESULT

The final cohort included 40 in the SOC and 37 patients in the study arm, with follow-up≥ 90 days. Median age was 69 years (IQR 65-76), 19 (25%) were females, and 28 (36%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ten patients (25%) developed UTIs in the SOC vs 0% in the study arm (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in complications or high-grade complications. 90-day infectious complications were 43% in the SOC arm vs 14% in the study arm (p=0.006), and 90-day infection-related readmissions were 30% in the SOC versus 5% in the study arm (p=0.007). The mean post-cystectomy cost was $9074 lower in the treatment arm compared to the SOC (p=0.007). The number needed to treat to prevent a single UTI was 4.0 (95% CI 2.5-7.0).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic antibiotics for 30 days after RARC…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 37 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free