Evidence Hub

Evaluation of efficacy of cholecalciferol and silymarin in improving lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

Reza Valipour, B. Narouie, Hamidreza Momeni, N. Radpour, Parham Torabinavid, Amirreza Momeni, Ali Jowzi

Urologiâ, 2024

80 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) mainly leads to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. The present study investigates the role of cholecalciferol, Silymarin, and their combined administration in patients with BPH suffering from LUTS. Methods: This double-blind, randomized, controlled trial enrolled 80 participants (50–80 years) diagnosed with BPH, from March 2019 to March 2020. Based on serum 25-(OH) vitamin D levels we formed subgroups, each receiving specific interventions. Measurements of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Maximal Urinary Flow Rate (Q-max), Prostate Volume (PV), Post-Void Residual (PVR), and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) were recorded at baseline and following 3 months of follow-up. Results: Participants with serum concentration of 25-(OH) vitamin D below 20 ng/ml simultaneously received cholecalciferol and Silymarin that significantly improved IPSS, irritation, obstruction, PV, and PVR. In those with concentrations ⩾20 ng/ml, a single use of Silymarin significantly reduced IPSS, irritation, obstruction, and PVR. Adjustment of confounding variables revealed independent and significant effects of both cholecalciferol and Silymarin on PVR, IPSS, and obstruction. Cholecalciferol also improved irritation, while Silymarin reduced prostate volume. These findings highlight potential therapeutic benefits for BPH-associated LUTS, encouraging further exploration and clinical consideration. Conclusions: In this investigation,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free