Evidence Hub

Salvia miltiorrhiza Root Extract for Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Dongho Shin, H. W. Moon, WoongJin Bae, U-Syn Ha, Young-Ho Park, Eun Joo Lee, Du-Ge-On Moon, Sae Woong Kim

Nutrients, 2024

136 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of urological diseases increases with age, and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) are the most common problem. Natural compounds with minimal side effects for the improvement in LUTSs are of ongoing interest. Salvia miltiorrhiza root extract (SAGX) has shown potential in preclinical studies for its effects on LUTSs. Objectives: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SAGX in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) over a 12-week period. Methods: A total of 136 subjects were randomized to receive either 400 mg or 800 mg of SAGX or a placebo daily, orally. The primary outcome was the change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Secondary outcomes included changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), testosterone levels, urinary flow rate, residual urine volume, and erectile function as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Results: Both SAGX intake groups showed statistically significant improvements in total IPSS scores and several secondary outcomes compared with the placebo group. Notable improvements were observed in symptoms of incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, weak stream, urgency, nocturia, and quality of life scores. Erectile function, as assessed by the IIEF, also significantly improved, especially in the 400 mg SAGX intake group. No significant differences were found in PSA levels or testosterone levels. No…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 136 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free