Evidence Hub

Intravesical bupivacaine in reducing catheter-related bladder discomfort and lower urinary tract symptoms after transurethral surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Jithesh Purushothaman, S. Kalra, L. Dorairajan, S. Selvarajan, K. Sreerag, Deepanshu Aggarwal

Indian Journal of Urology, 2024

7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: The objectives of this study were to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravesical bupivacaine instillation in reducing catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after transurethral surgery. Methods: The study enrolled 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I–III patients aged ≥18 years undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, randomly assigned to Group B (intravesical bupivacaine) or Group S (saline). Double blinding was employed. Independent variables included demographics, surgery type, ASA grade, and intervention details. Dependent variables comprised CRBD severity, Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Pelvic Pain Urgency Frequency (PUF), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, need for additional analgesics, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). SPSS version 19 was used for analysis with a significance level of P < 0.05. Side effects such as hematuria were also recorded. Results: Group B reported significantly lower “moderate” CRBD immediately (2% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and at 12 h (0% vs. 18%, P = 0.003) post-instillation compared to Group S and also required fewer additional analgesics (4% vs. 46%). The PPBC at catheter removal also favored Group B (P = 0.003) and day 1 (P < 0.001). The PUF scores were also significantly lower in Group B at catheter removal (P = 0.001) and at day 1 (P = 0.028). The IPSS was also…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free