Evidence Hub

First Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing D-Mannose to Fosfomycin in Acute Uncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Infections

F. Wagenlehner, Heidrun Taeschner, H. Lorenz, Anja Berwanger, Nacera Infed, O. Ewald, P. Gerke

Antibiotics, 2026

118 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Antibiotics are the recommended first-line therapy for acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (cystitis), but antibiotic resistance and tolerability concerns require antibiotic-sparing strategies. This study evaluated D-mannose as a stand-alone alternative. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind study compared D-mannose to fosfomycin in women aged 18–70 with cystitis. Clinical cure (CC) was assessed using the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) up to day 8, with non-inferiority tested at the 15% margin. Post hoc analytical approaches accounted for potential bias due to low sample sizes and missing values. Results: The study randomized 118 patients. At baseline, severe symptoms (ACSS ≥ 12) were more frequent in the D-mannose group compared to fosfomycin (32.8% vs. 22.8%). Efficacy analyses were performed on the per-protocol set (D-mannose: N = 57; fosfomycin: N = 54). Median time to CC was 5.0 days (D-mannose) and 3.0 days (fosfomycin) overall, and 4.0 days vs. 3.0 days in the subgroup of moderate disease severity. The point estimate for the CC rate difference on day 8 (−10.1%) favored fosfomycin but was within the non-inferiority margin. Due to wide confidence intervals, non-inferiority was not statistically confirmed. The post hoc analysis yielded smaller confidence intervals with estimated CC rates of 84.2% (D-mannose) vs. 83.5% (fosfomycin) on day 8 and statistically demonstrated the comparability of both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 118 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free