Evidence Hub

Vaginal Estrogen Application Techniques for Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection: A Randomized Trial

Stephanie W. Zuo, E. Mowers, Shea Hem, Megan Bradley, H. Zyczynski, Sharon L. Hillier, Mary F Ackenbom

Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026

270 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether periurethral estrogen application is noninferior to intravaginal estrogen application for the prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in postmenopausal individuals with laboratory-proven recurrent UTI.

METHODS

The TAPER (Techniques of Applying Vaginal Estrogen for Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections) trial was a single-center, nonblinded, randomized noninferiority trial that compared outcomes after a twice-weekly intravaginal estradiol applicator instillation of 1.0 g cream (intravaginal) compared with periurethral digital application of 0.5 g cream (periurethral) in postmenopausal individuals with recurrent UTIs. The primary outcome was the proportion of UTI-free participants at 6 months postintervention. Secondary outcomes included number of UTIs, the amount of time elapsed to the first UTI, vaginal pH, PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) scores, patient experience with the study drug, study drug adverse effects, and urinary and sexual function. To achieve 80% power with a type 1 error of 5% and to account for loss to follow-up, 114 participants needed to be randomized based on a noninferiority margin of 25%.

RESULTS

Of 270 eligible individuals, 114 consented and were randomized (57 intravaginal, 57 periurethral). Participants were predominantly White (92.1%) with a mean age of 71.1 years (range 52-93). Participants reported a median of three UTIs in the 12 months before enrollment. Individuals randomized to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 270 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free