Evidence Hub

Abstract 4139688: Empagliflozin versus Placebo in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adarsh Raja, Muhammad Ahmed, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Hafsah Alim Ur Rahman, Sandesh Raja

Circulation, 2024

Abstract

Background:

Historically, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and concurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD) have been managed through multifactorial interventions, including lifestyle modifications. Recently, empagliflozin, a potent sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), has emerged as a novel antidiabetic agent demonstrating significant improvements in cardiovascular outcomes.

Aim:

To conduct a meta-analysis comparing empagliflozin with placebo in patients with T2DM and concomitant CVD.

Methods:

We performed a thorough literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to May 2024 to identify studies comparing empagliflozin with placebo in patients with T2DM and concomitant CVD. Effect estimates were pooled using a random-effects model and reported as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and standard mean difference (SMD) or mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, each accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Due to varying units of measurement for HbA1c that were not interconvertible, SMD was employed. Conversely, MD was used for the analysis of other continuous outcomes.

Results:

16 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Empagliflozin significantly reduced HbA1c (SMD: -1.33 [-2.28, -0.38]; p=0.006;

Figure

) and cardiac mortality (RR= 0.62 [0.50, 0.78]; p<0.0001), in comparison to placebo. Empagliflozin was also associated with a significantly greater reduction in systolic blood pressure (MD: -5.22 [-7.97, -2.47];…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free