Evidence Hub

Effects of a self‐efficacy‐centered self‐management program on neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial

Xiang-Xiang Tang, Qian Liu, Xiao-Ping Su, Zepeng Yu

Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 2025

82 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The present research aimed to investigate the effects of a self‐efficacy‐centered self‐management program on persons with neurogenic bladder (NGB) after spinal cord injury (SCI). Design A randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods Eighty‐two individuals with NGB after spinal cord injury (SCI) were randomized into either the control or intervention group. The control group received standard admission and discharge education and follow‐up. The intervention group received the self‐efficacy‐centered self‐management program. Self‐efficacy was assessed at preintervention, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post‐intervention. Self‐management ability, the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI), residual urine volume, bladder safety capacity, and quality of life were assessed at 12 weeks post‐intervention. Results Of the 82 recruited participants, only 79 participants (control group: n = 39, 67% males, intervention group: n = 40, 58% males) received the full intervention. A significant difference was observed in self‐efficacy score between the control and intervention groups (2.54 ± .247 versus 2.71 ± .218, mean difference = .174, 95% confidential interval: .070–.278, p = .001) at 12 weeks post‐intervention. The intervention group demonstrated significantly better outcomes than the control group at 12 weeks post‐intervention in self‐management ability, urinary tract infection (UTI) incidence, residual urine volume and bladder safety capacity. There were significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 82 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free