Evidence Hub

Assessing the Effectiveness and Safety of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetics with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Hassan A. Alharbi, Reem Abdulrahman Naser Albasri, R. Jan, N. Hamood, Faisal Alqahtani, M. Alsuwaylih, Y. Alanazi, Mohammad Al Mohaini

Journal of Advanced Trends in Medical Research, 2024

729 participants

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), comprising ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina, is a significant coronary heart disease subcategory causing one-third of deaths in individuals aged 35 and above. Risk factors for ACS include smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and more. Diabetes mellitus, linked to cardiovascular (CV) disease risk factors, increases coronary artery disease (CAD) mortality risk by 2–4 times and negatively impacts post-myocardial infarction prognosis. Empagliflozin, an antidiabetic agent for type 2 diabetes patients, works by inhibiting sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) in kidneys, reducing renal glucose reabsorption and increasing urinary glucose excretion. SGLT2 inhibitors like empagliflozin may lower CV event risks, reduce heart failure hospitalisations and improve cardiac function parameters. However, specific empagliflozin outcomes on diabetic patients with CAD need further meta-analysis investigation.

We conducted a comprehensive search across four electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) up until April 2024, to identify pertinent studies evaluating the effectiveness of empagliflozin in the treatment of type 2 diabetics with acute coronary syndrome. The quality of evidence from trials was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool 1. The data from the included studies were extracted into a uniform online sheet and analysed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 729 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free