Evidence Hub

Abstract 4144446: Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin after Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Zina Otmani, M. Yassin, Hazem Ayman Elsayed, F. Alahmed, B. A. Al Zoubi, Omar Hany Mohammed, Abdelbassat Belakhdar, Ahmed K. Awad

Circulation, 2024

10,697 participants

Abstract

Introduction:

Empagliflozin, a sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor, improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with or without diabetes mellitus. However, limited data is available regarding its impact after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, we aimed in our meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of empagliflozin after AMI.

Methods:

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to April 19th, 2024, to identify any Randomized Controlled trials (RCTs) that compare empagliflozin to placebo after AMI. The safety outcomes were presented as short term cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), and any adverse events. The efficacy outcomes were reported as NT-proBNP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and LDL-c. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled in the form of risk ratio (RR), and continuous outcomes in form of mean difference (MD), with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results:

Ten RCTs with a total of 10,697 patients were included. Empagliflozin was associated with significant lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.46, 0.71]), all cause mortality, and hospitalization for heart failure, (RR=0.64, 95% CI [0.53, 0.79]), (RR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.58, 0.79]), respectively. Furthermore, empagliflozin demonstrated a significant reduction in both NT-proBNP (MD = -161.26, 95% CI [-294.58,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 10,697 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free