Evidence Hub

Hemoadsorption in critically ill neonatal and pediatric patients: a retrospective cohort study from a Latin American tertiary center

Piñeres-Olave BE, Herrera-Vargas JS, Tibaduiza D, Marin-Agudelo A, Sarmiento MP, Salazar S, Niño-Jaimes L, Arango-Mesa N

Frontiers in medicine, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Extracorporeal blood purification therapies, such as hemoadsorption, are increasingly utilized in intensive care to modulate inflammation, improve organ function, and reduce vasoactive support. However, data on their use in neonatal and pediatric populations remain limited, particularly in low-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate clinical and laboratory outcomes in critically ill pediatric patients receiving hemoadsorption therapy alongside extracorporeal organ support.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study in a tertiary neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit in Latin America. Eleven critically ill patients received hemoadsorption using CytoSorb® or Oxiris® in combination with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We assessed organ dysfunction scores (PELOD-2), vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), inflammatory markers (CRP, lactate), oxygenation parameters, and liver and hematologic profiles before and after therapy.

Results: Hemoadsorption was associated with reductions in PELOD-2 (median 11-7; p = 0.036) and VIS (median 75-6; p = 0.014). Lactate levels decreased significantly (p p = 0.042). CRP levels declined without reaching statistical significance. Liver and hematologic markers remained largely unchanged. 28-day-mortality was 54.5%.

Discussion: Hemoadsorption in conjunction with CRRT and/or ECMO showed potential to improve hemodynamic stability, oxygenation,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free