Evidence Hub

Secondary Analysis of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Patients Enrolled in a Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Study Provides a Novel Paradigm for Etio-Pathogenesis and Practical Management of This Infection Phenotype

J. Nickel, T. Cotechini, R. Doiron

Pathogens, 2024

16 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Introduction: A subset of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) patients experience recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) associated with symptom flares. Recurrent UTI subjects with associated IC/BPS were enrolled in the first North American early clinical experience trial evaluating a new sublingual UTI preventative vaccine, MV140. It has been shown that women with rUTI develop an imbalance in the T helper 1 and 2 (Th2 over-expression) in the bladder mucosa. Our hypothesis-generating secondary analysis will suggest that this infection subcategory of IC/BPS patients develop a similar imbalance of Th1-Th2 response type to bacteria present in their urinary microbiome, leading to a bladder hypersensitivity that responds to mucosal immune modulation. Methods: Female participants with ≥3 documented UTI/year underwent a 3-month vaccination treatment period with a 9-month efficacy period after completion of vaccine treatment (total 12 months). There were no exclusion criteria for subjects in relation to baseline urinary symptoms and/or discomfort/pain. Primary outcome was no UTI following vaccination. Secondary outcomes included change in UTI incidence, overall patient-reported subjective global assessment (SGA responder defined as moderately or markedly improved on 7-point scale), and safety. Results: Sixteen subjects with IC/BPS-related symptoms and rUTI (mean age 47; range 23–74 years; mean number of UTI episodes in previous year 6.1 +/− 4.2) were eligible to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free