Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin Effect on Left Cardiac Parameters in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ghaith Y. Eljadid, M. Rakab, A. Mansour, Nereen A. Almosilhy, Ahmed W. Abbas, Noura Abdrabou, Amira S Alarab, Y. Mohamed et al.

Cureus, 2024

701 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) poses a significant global health burden despite advancements in its management. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, primarily used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have gained recent consideration as potential agents for ACS management due to their cardiovascular benefits beyond glycemic control. This study aimed to assess the effects of empagliflozin on left cardiac parameters in ACS patients. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched thoroughly to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four RCTs involving 701 patients were included. Compared to placebo, empagliflozin significantly reduced left ventricular end-systolic volume index (mean difference (MD): -2.38, 95% CI: -3.95 to -0.80, p = 0.0032), left ventricular mass index (MD: -2.76, 95% CI: -4.95 to -0.56, p = 0.0137), and left ventricular filling pressure (MD: -0.59, 95% CI: -1.07 to -0.10, p = 0.0189). However, empagliflozin treatment did not yield a statistically significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (MD: 1.21, 95% CI: -0.05 to 2.48, p = 0.0603) nor a significant change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (MD: -4.49, 95% CI: -14.24 to 5.26, p = 0.37), left ventricular end-systolic volume (MD: -5.19, 95% CI: -10.77 to 0.39, p = 0.0682), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (MD: -2.20, 95% CI: -4.59 to 0.19, p = 0.0718). Empagliflozin provides favorable effects on left cardiac structural parameters in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 701 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free