Evidence Hub

Abstract 4113561: Efficacy and Outcomes of Empagliflozin in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hritvik Jain, R. Odat, Aman Goyal, Jyoti Jain, S. Rathore, Nandan Patel, Neha Pervez, Siddhant Passey et al.

Circulation, 2024

7,229 participants

Abstract

Background:

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated mortality benefits in patients with heart failure (HF). Since acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an increasingly prevalent cardiovascular condition that often leads to HF, SGLT2i might play a role in reducing mortality in these patients. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated inconsistent efficacy of Empagliflozin, an SGLT2i, in patients with ACS.

Methods:

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted spanning the major bibliographic databases to retrieve RCTs comparing Empagliflozin to placebo in patients with ACS. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Results:

5 RCTs were included with 7229 ACS patients (3608 in the Empagliflozin group and 3621 in the placebo group). Empagliflozin treatment was not associated with a statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality [OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.17; p=0.60], cardiovascular death [OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.28; p=0.99], hospitalization for heart failure [OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.42, 1.74; p=0.67], serious adverse events [OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 0.29, 11.87; p=0.51], LVEF on follow-up [MD: 4.35; 95% CI: -4.52, 13.23; p=0.34], NT-ProBNP [MD: -126.02; 95% CI: -279.37, 27.32; p=0.11], estimated glomerular filtration rate [MD: 1.59; 95% CI: -1.35, 4.52; p=0.29], and HbA1c [MD:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,229 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free