Evidence Hub

Urinary tract infection and continuation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in diabetic patients

Mei-Zhen Wu, R. Guo, C. Chandramouli, Lin Liu, Anthony M. Tung, C. Tsang, Yi-Kei Tse, Y. Chan et al.

European Heart Journal, 2025

61 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To investigate the impact of incident urinary tract infection (UTI) and subsequent sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors discontinuation on clinical outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors.

METHODS

This territory-wide cohort study analysed patients with T2DM prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors from January 2015 to June 2022. Primary outcomes included primary cardiovascular composite outcomes (heart failure hospitalization, stroke, myocardial infarction, or all-cause mortality) and primary renal composite outcomes (50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], end-stage renal failure, or all-cause mortality). The secondary outcome was recurrent UTI. A target trial emulation was applied to estimate the impact of discontinuing SGLT2 inhibitors.

RESULTS

Among 61 606 eligible patients, 3921 (6.36%) had at least one UTI incidence during follow-up. Patients with incident UTI exhibited a higher risk of primary cardiovascular composite outcomes [hazards ratio (HR): 3.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.88-3.51] and primary renal composite outcomes (HR: 2.51, 95% CI: 2.32-2.72) compared to those without UTI. Following a UTI, 32.31% of patients discontinued SGLT2 inhibitors. Discontinuation was associated with a higher cardiovascular (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.20-1.53) and renal (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.21-1.51) risks compared to continued use, while the risk of recurrent UTI was similar (HR: 0.96, 95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 61 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free