Evidence Hub

Urinary tract infections and urinary bladder health experiences of persons with spinal cord injury in a Canadian province: A mixed methods study showcasing infection prevention as health inequity case

Jocelyn Brady, A. Loyola-Sánchez, Steven Crochetiere, R. MacIsaac, Erika Kulik, Yoshino Okuma, M. Cwiklewich, M. Mouneimne et al.

Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine (JSCM), 2024

39 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Context/Objective Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most frequent secondary complications among people with spinal cord injury (SCI). The prevention and management of UTIs is prioritized by stakeholders across Canada. The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the urinary bladder (bladder) management experiences of people with SCI in Alberta communities, especially how UTIs are experienced and managed. Design Convergent mixed methods parallel databases variant. Setting Communities across Alberta, Canada. Participants 39 survey participants and 19 interview participants, all with SCI. Methods One-on-one phone semi-structured interviews analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative surveys included demographic, multichoice, and Likert Scale questions analyzed using descriptive analysis. Both methods explored people with SCI’s experiences with bladder management and UTIs. Qualitative and quantitative results were integrated through a comparison joint display table and meta-inferences. Outcome Measures Qualitative themes and descriptive statistics further integrated as mixed core-statements. Results Bladder routine is central to daily life and maintaining bladder health, avoiding UTIs, is the priority. Several health inequities are related to (1) financial barriers dictating how bladder is managed, (2) low perceived support for appropriate bladder management, (3) low healthcare access to appropriate UTI management and (4) low providers’…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free