Evidence Hub

Abstract 4121215: Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

O. Obi

Circulation, 2024

23,178 participants

Abstract

Background:

Empagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor that improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and heart failure. Less is known about the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Methods:

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the outcomes of interets including all-cause mortality, death from cardiovascular causes, hospitalization due to heart failure etc. Risks ratios (RR) or mean difference (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed with the use of random-effect model. Heterogeneity was examined with I

2

statistics.

Results:

We included 12 RCT articles consisting of 23,178 patients that received empagliflozin after acute myocardial infarction were considered. Empagliflozin was associated with significantly reduced incidence of all-cause mortality (RR 0.72; 95% CI [0.61, 0.85]; P < 0.0001; 5.9% vs 7.4%), death from cardiovascular causes (RR 0.66; 95% CI [0.52, 0.83]; P = 0.0004; 4.0% vs 5.4%), and hospitalization for heart failure (RR 0.66; 95% CI [0.58, 0.76]; P < 0.00001; 3.2% vs 4.7%), acute kidney injury (RR 0.52; 95% CI [0.31, 0.86]; P = 0.01), acute renal failure (RR 0.71; 95% CI [0.55, 0.91]; P = 0.008), adverse events leading to discontinuation (RR 0.89; 95% CI [0.80, 0.99]; P = 0.03), systolic blood pressure (MD -8.59; 95% CI [-13.26, -3.93], P = 0.0003), and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 23,178 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free