Evidence Hub

Perforated Meckel’s diverticulum misdiagnosed as a urinary tract infection in an 11-year-old adolescent: case report of a rare differential diagnosis

Mohamed Ali, H. H. Warda, A. Elghrieb

Patient Safety in Surgery, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Meckel’s diverticulum, a congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract, is often asymptomatic but can present with complications such as inflammation, perforation, or obstruction. Misdiagnosis is common owing to its varied presentations, particularly when symptoms mimic other conditions such as urinary tract infections (UTI). An 11-year-old boy presented with persistent suprapubic pain and dysuria for one week. Initial urine analysis revealed turbid urine with high numbers of red blood cells, leading to a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI), and antibiotic treatment was initiated. However, the patient’s symptoms persisted, with worsening clinical signs. A complete blood count revealed leukocytosis with neutrophilia, suggesting the need for further evaluation. A non contrast computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a thickened, blind-ended structure in the midline lower abdomen with gas, extensive fat stranding, and associated mesenteric lymphadenopathy, suggestive of perforated Meckel’s diverticulum. The patient underwent laparoscopic exploration, which revealed an abscess caused by perforated Meckel’s diverticulum adherent to the urinary bladder. Diverticulectomy and incidental appendectomy were performed via a stapling device. Pathology confirmed a perforation of Meckel’s diverticulum with serofibrinous peritonitis and follicular appendicitis. The postoperative course was uneventful, with the patient resuming full oral intake by the fifth day and being discharged…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free