Evidence Hub

Maternal diseases and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract in offspring: a cohort study

Qiang Ma, Ya-Qi Li, Qing-Tang Meng, Bo Yang, Hai-Tao Zhang, Hua Shi, Chang-You Liu, Tian-Chao Xiang et al.

World Journal of Pediatrics, 2024

19,656 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT) are the most common cause of prenatally diagnosed developmental malformation. This study aimed to assess the relationship between maternal diseases and CAKUT in offspring. This retrospective study enrolled all pregnant women registered from January 2020 to December 2022 at one medical center. Medical information on maternal noncommunicable diseases, including obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, kidney disease, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, psychiatric disease, epilepsy, cancer, and autoimmune disease was collected. Based on the records of ultrasound scanning during the third trimester, the diagnosis was classified as isolated urinary tract dilation (UTD) or kidney anomalies. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to establish models to predict antenatal CAKUT. Among the 19,656 pregnant women, perinatal ultrasound detected suspicious CAKUT in 114 (5.8/1000) fetuses, comprising 89 cases with isolated UTD and 25 cases with kidney anomalies. The risk of antenatal CAKUT was increased in the fetuses of mothers who experienced gestational diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, neuropsychiatric disease, anemia, ovarian and uterine disorders. A prediction model for isolated UTD was developed utilizing four confounding factors, namely gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, maternal thyroid dysfunction, and hepatic disease. Similarly, a separate prediction model for kidney anomalies was established based on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19,656 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free