Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial susceptibility and risk factors of uropathogens in symptomatic urinary tract infection cases at Dessie Referral Hospital, Ethiopia

Destaw Kebede, Yeromnesh Shiferaw, E. Kebede, Wondmagegn Demsiss

BMC Microbiology, 2025

256 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections encountered by clinicians in developing countries, affecting the urethra, bladder, and kidneys. It is a prevalent infectious disease among outpatients and hospitalized patients, leading to morbidity and mortality. Antibiotic resistance among uropathogens varies geographically, but empirical treatment is common in our study area. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial susceptibility and risk factors of uropathogens in symptomatic UTI cases at Dessie Referral Hospital in northeast Ethiopia. A hospital-based cross-sectional study design was utilized to examine 256 participants with urinary tract complaints from February 1, 2024, to May 30, 2024. Consecutive convenience sampling was used to select participants. Midstream urine samples were collected, and bacteriological tests, including culture, Gram stain, biochemical tests, and antimicrobial susceptibility tests, were conducted following standard procedures. The data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were carried out to identify potential risk factors associated with urinary tract infection. The overall prevalence of bacteriuria was 22.7%. Escherichia coli (E. coli) accounted for the highest proportion 21(30.4%), followed by Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) at 15(21.7%) and Klebsiella spp 12(17.4%). Most Gram-positive bacteria were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 256 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free