Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin in patients with myocardial infarction: an updated meta-analysis

M. Abouzid, N. Al-dardery, H. Ghaith, H. Khitiy, A. Khaity

European Heart Journal, 2023

7,300 participants

Abstract

Empagliflozin is one of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors that is used to treat type 2 diabetes and has recently been studied for its potential benefits in patients with myocardial infarction.

We performed this meta-analysis to update the present evidence about the safety and efficacy of empagliflozin in patients with myocardial infarction.

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until February 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as mean difference (MD) or risk ratios (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) in the meta-analysis models using Review Manager (RevMan version 5.4).

Pooling data from 9 RCTs (7300 patients) showed that empagliflozin was superior to placebo in terms of cardiovascular death (RR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.46, 0.71], P < 0.00001), hospitalization due to heart failure (RR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.48, 0.79], P =0.0001), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = - 8.59, 95% CI [-13.26, -3.93], P = 0.0003). The overall effect did not favor either of the two groups in terms of body weight (MD = - 1.03, 95% CI [-4.05, 1.98], P =0.5), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD = - 1.48, 95% CI [-4.36, 1.41], P =0.3), eGFR (MD = 2.19, 95% CI [-0.10, 4.48], P =0.06), HbA1c (MD = - 0.10, 95% CI [-0.41, 0.22], P =0.5), NT-proBNP (MD = - 115.9, 95% CI [-271.5, 39.6], P =0.1), and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free