Evidence Hub

Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in pediatric urinary tract infection cases: a cross-sectional study

Saleem Asghar Shar Baloch, Aqib Ashraf, Shaista Hamid, Rabia Azam, Tehreem Abbas, Sidra Rafique, Malghalara Masood

Insights-Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 2025

422 participants

Abstract

Background:Pediatric urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common clinical concern, with increasing resistance to empirical antibiotics posing a major challenge to effective management. Local resistance surveillance is essential for guiding appropriate treatment strategies.

Objective:To assess the frequency and resistance patterns of uropathogens isolated from pediatric UTI cases in a tertiary care hospital in Lahore.

Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted over eight months, enrolling 422 children aged 1 month to 12 years with culture-confirmed UTIs. Urine samples were processed using standard microbiological techniques. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines. Data were analyzed using SPSS v26, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Results:Escherichia coli was the most prevalent uropathogen (69.2%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.7%) and Proteus mirabilis (5.7%). High resistance rates were observed in E. coli to ampicillin (84.6%), co-trimoxazole (65.1%), and cefixime (52.3%). Nitrofurantoin (13.4%) and meropenem (3.4%) showed the lowest resistance. Multidrug resistance was identified in 53.4% of E. coli and 65.5% of Klebsiella isolates. The findings reveal a concerning trend of diminished efficacy of first-line antibiotics in pediatric UTIs.

Conclusion:The high prevalence of resistant and multidrug-resistant uropathogens necessitates routine local antibiogram development…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 422 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free