Evidence Hub

Risk factors contributing to catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a hospital-based cross-sectional study

Swati Sahai, D. Agatha

International journal of scientific research, 2025

100 participants

Abstract

Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) remain the most frequently encountered hospital-acquired infections. Their

occurrence is influenced by multiple clinical and demographic risk factors. Objective: This study aimed to explore the relationship between

symptomatic CAUTI and commonly reported high-risk variables. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was carried out over a 12-month period,

enrolling 100 patients with indwelling urinary catheters. Symptomatic CAUTI was identified using established diagnostic criteria. Potential

contributing factors such as age, sex, duration of catheterization, diabetes, immunosuppressive therapy, and underlying medical conditions were

examined for association. Results: The incidence of CAUTI was calculated at 25.67 per 1,000 catheter days. The highest frequency was noted

among patients aged 71–80 years. Diabetes mellitus was strongly associated with infection, conferring nearly six-fold higher odds. Similarly,

neurological disorders (Odds Ratio 5.16) and respiratory diseases (Odds Ratio 6.44) were significant risk factors. Patients with pre-existing

urological or nephrological conditions demonstrated the greatest vulnerability, with an odds ratio of 13.27. Conclusion: Identifying individuals at

increased risk of CAUTI is essential for guiding preventive strategies. Limiting catheter duration, optimizing glycemic control, and ensuring

adherence to aseptic practices during insertion and maintenance are key measures.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free