Evidence Hub

Prevalence of recurrent urinary tract infections and its associated factors in female staff of reproductive age group in a medical college in central Kerala: a cross-sectional study

Franco Johny V, V. T. Krishnadas Menon, Sneha Georgy, C. Saju, M. P. Jini

BMC Infectious Diseases, 2025

417 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

To study the prevalence of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) and its associated factors in female staff of reproductive age group in a medical college in central Kerala. Recurrent UTIs can be defined as ≥ 3 episodes of UTIs within a period of 12 months. Females with recurrent UTIs have lower health-related quality of life compared to the general population; the incidence of UTI in women of reproductive age group is very common. This study focused on female employees of reproductive age group in a private medical college. A cross-sectional study was done among female staff of reproductive age group in a private medical college in central Kerala, with a sample size of 417. All female staff (18–49 years) were given a questionnaire and asked to fill it out. All those who filled out the questionnaire were included in the study according to both inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data entry and analysis were performed via Microsoft Excel 2019 and SPSS version 22.0. Our study of 417 participants revealed a prevalence of recurrent UTIs of 22.30% (95% CI = 18.3- 26.3%). Recurrent UTI was significantly associated with daily water intake, urination frequency, holding urine, foul-smelling vaginal discharge, constipation, pre-coital urination, and pre- and post-intercourse vaginal hygiene. Also, occupation was found to be significantly associated with recurrent UTI, with cleaning staff having higher odds. Our study found the prevalence of recurrent UTI in 417 population as 22.30%.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 417 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free