Evidence Hub

Factors Associated with Stigma in Adult Women with Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Yaodi Wei, Hong-Yuan Liu, Peng Jiang, Shiyu Wang, Yu Zhao, Zhi Li, Si-Yu Fan, Na Zhang et al.

Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 2025

240 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background Due to the specific nature of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs), female patients are often labelled with stigma. The presence of stigma has a serious impact on their mental health, social functioning and healthcare-seeking behavior, which in turn affects disease recovery. Purpose To identify the sense of stigma and its associated influencing factors in female patients with uUTIs. Patients and Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2022 and December 2023, during which samples were collected from 240 adult women with uUTIs from various healthcare facilities in Wuxi, China. General information questionnaires, the Chinese Version of the Social Impact Scale (range 24 to 96), the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale, the Self-Rated Anxiety Scale and the Self-Rated Depression Scale were used. SPSS 27.0 was used to create the database and statistical analysis was performed after data entry by two people. Results A total of 240 validated questionnaires were collected in this study, and the patients’ stigma score was 2.71 ± 0.37 (at a moderate level of stigma). Internalized stigma was the highest and social isolation the lowest of the four dimensions of stigma. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that the level of stigma was higher in patients with symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency, and hematuria uUTIs. uUTIs with longer duration of symptoms, more frequent episodes, less knowledge about the disease, higher anxiety…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free